In a startling revelation, a former high-ranking official at the Foreign Office accused the Prime Minister’s office of showing little regard for the necessity of vetting Peter Mandelson before his appointment. Sir Olly Robbins, who was dismissed from his position, disclosed to a parliamentary committee that there was uncertainty over whether Mandelson would undergo vetting procedures before heading to Washington. This revelation has intensified the pressure on Keir Starmer, who faces a political crisis following the revelation that UK Security Vetting did not grant clearance to Mandelson.
The Prime Minister expressed his surprise at not being informed about the situation, leading to Sir Olly’s dismissal. During a detailed interrogation by the Foreign Affairs Committee, Sir Olly disclosed several uncomfortable truths, including being pressured to secure an ambassadorial role for one of the PM’s key aides.
Moreover, Sir Olly highlighted the urgency placed on getting Mandelson to Washington swiftly, emphasizing that the focus was on speed rather than the actual vetting process itself. He noted the significant expectation from No10 to expedite Mandelson’s placement in America, even before Trump’s inauguration.
Furthermore, Sir Olly revealed that there was hesitation within certain governmental circles regarding the necessity of vetting Mandelson, citing his status as a member of the House of Lords and a privy counsellor. The former official expressed concern over the leak of UKSV’s findings, which he deemed a severe threat to national security.
Sir Olly also shed light on the internal discussions regarding Matthew Doyle, the former Director of Communications for the Prime Minister, being considered for an ambassadorial role. He mentioned that there were directives from No10 to find a suitable position for Doyle, despite discomfort over not informing the then-Foreign Secretary.
Additionally, Sir Olly emphasized the importance of confidentiality in the vetting process and highlighted the potential risks associated with the public disclosure of such sensitive information. He raised alarm at the breach of trust and security that occurred when details of Mandelson’s vetting status were revealed to the public.
In the face of intense questioning, Sir Olly maintained that proper procedures were followed in handling Mandelson’s vetting process, despite the external pressures. He stressed the rigorous adherence to protocol within the department, even when faced with challenges and expectations from government officials.
Lastly, Sir Olly expressed regret over the lack of opportunity to address concerns before his dismissal, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in decision-making processes.