The previously dismissed former head of the Foreign Office has alleged that No10 showed a lack of interest in vetting Peter Mandelson and suggested that ensuring proper vetting for him was not automatically assumed. Sir Olly Robbins, who was recently removed from his role as the department’s permanent secretary by Keir Starmer, also claimed that he faced pressure to secure a high-ranking position for the Prime Minister’s former aide, Matthew Doyle. These revelations have emerged as Mr. Starmer fights to maintain his political stance amidst the Mandelson controversy that has thrown the Government into disarray.
During his testimony before the Foreign Affairs Committee, Sir Olly stated, “I don’t believe, at the time of his appointment and in the days that followed, that it was a definite decision that he would undergo vetting.”
A political upheaval has erupted between No10 and the Foreign Office following the revelation that Peter Mandelson did not pass security vetting, yet no ministers, including Mr. Starmer, were informed. In a lengthy Commons statement, the PM expressed his outrage at officials who concealed this information from him, stating that it is astonishing that the Foreign Office withheld such crucial details.
Meanwhile, Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister, Darren Jones, has announced an inquiry into leaks surrounding Lord Peter Mandelson’s security vetting information. Addressing MPs, he expressed concern about the information being shared with The Guardian newspaper while ministers remained unaware, prompting the launch of a leak investigation.
In response to accusations, Darren Jones denied claims that the Foreign Office deemed vetting unnecessary for Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the US ambassador. He clarified that discussions were held regarding the necessity of further vetting due to Lord Mandelson’s affiliations, emphasizing that seeking developed vetting status was indeed considered.
Labour MP Imran Hussain has called for an independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment, emphasizing the need for accountability, particularly for the Prime Minister. Similarly, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey criticized the PM’s decision to appoint Lord Mandelson, labeling it as a severe misjudgment that has led to the current crisis.
The ongoing developments surrounding the Mandelson controversy have sparked intense debates in the political arena, with various MPs voicing their concerns and calling for transparency and accountability in the handling of sensitive appointments.