Nearly 150 children’s organizations have criticized the Government for what they call a sustained assault on children’s rights. They are urging a reversal of the plan to use handcuffs on children during deportations, labeling the proposed increase in force against children as “abhorrent.” These groups, including the British Association of Social Workers, Children’s Rights Alliance for England, and The Fostering Network, expressed concerns about the impact of new settlement rules that could lead to tens of thousands of young individuals living in poverty.
The Government is currently seeking feedback on a proposal that would allow officers to handcuff and physically manage children onto deportation flights if they resist. In a joint letter to Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, the organizations emphasized the inappropriateness of describing harm to children as ‘unfortunate but necessary and justified.’
In their communication to the authorities, the 148 groups emphasized the importance of protecting children’s rights in the face of policy changes affecting young migrants. They emphasized the need for policies that recognize the value of every child and ensure their well-being.
Rita Waters, the group chief executive of the National Youth Advocacy Service, stressed the significance of treating every child with care and protection, highlighting the potential detrimental effects of the proposed measures on children.
The Home Office defended its actions, stating that steps are being taken to manage immigration effectively. The consultation process initiated in March aims to address the issue of families without legal status in the UK.
Shabana Mahmood outlined measures intended to reform the immigration and asylum system, such as introducing temporary refugee status subject to regular reviews. Additionally, plans are in place to extend the time required for migrants to qualify for indefinite leave to remain, which children’s organizations argue could push thousands of children into poverty by limiting their access to benefits.
The groups are calling for a child rights impact assessment to evaluate the consequences of the proposed changes on young individuals. Amina Khanom, director of Reset Communities for Refugees, emphasized the importance of stability and security for children’s future well-being.
Leyla Williams, Deputy Director of West London Welcome, highlighted public sentiment against the use of force, including handcuffing children, during deportations. The proposal to allow physical force, including handcuffs in extreme cases, against children has sparked debate and raised concerns among child welfare advocates.
A document from the consultation process revealed that a significant number of disrupted enforced returns involve families, with children often being affected. The proposal emphasizes the need for officers to use minimal physical contact and prohibits certain techniques that could cause pain or affect breathing.
The Home Office emphasized the necessity of addressing the challenges posed by high levels of migration and reiterated its commitment to reforming the immigration system. The government’s actions are aimed at restoring order and reducing child poverty while tackling educational disparities.